Segment
1. Continental UltraContact Premium2. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kenda (63%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the UltraContact and the Kenetica Pro KR210 were tested.
| # | Continental UltraContact
| Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Continental UltraContact Rating: Good | dobré | 1,7 | 2,6 | ||||
| Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,0 | 2,4 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
