Segment
1. Continental UltraContact Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Germany. Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Fulda (73%). The first tyre test of Continental UltraContact was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Fulda EcoControl HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the UltraContact and the EcoControl HP2 were tested.
| # | Continental UltraContact
| Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Continental UltraContact Rating: Good | dobré | 1,7 | 2,6 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,2 | 2,8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
