Segment
1. Continental SportContact 5P Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental SportContact 5P vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kumho (60%). Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2015 235/35 R19 test, where both the SportContact 5P and the Ecsta PS91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Continental SportContact 5P has A wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B rating.
| # | Continental SportContact 5P
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5P Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5P Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | vysoce doporučeno | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | ||
| Continental SportContact 5P Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | doporučeno | 9 | 9 | 7 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | podmíněně doporučeno | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
