Segment
2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 5 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2020 215/50 R18 test, where both the SportContact 5 SUV and the WetProof were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Continental SportContact 5 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WetProof also have A wet ratings.
# | Continental SportContact 5 SUV
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
2. Nokian WetProof 5.64
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi dobré + | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Very good | velmi dobré | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
Nokian WetProof Rating: Good + | dobré + | 2.6 | 1.3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
Show test details |