Comparison: Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 5 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2020 215/50 R18 test, where both the SportContact 5 SUV and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Continental SportContact 5 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (82%) of the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Continental SportContact 5 SUV
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi dobré + | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Very good | velmi dobré | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: - | velmi dobré + | 1.1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
