Segment
2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Falken (70%). The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 5 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2020 215/50 R18 test, where both the SportContact 5 SUV and the Azenis FK510 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Continental SportContact 5 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (57%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV also have A wet ratings.
| # | Continental SportContact 5 SUV
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
Offroad
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Very good | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Rating: Very good - | 1.8 | 1.7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
