Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental CrossContact UHP vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 41% of Continental CrossContact UHP dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
| # | Continental CrossContact UHP
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R23 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
