Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Continental (77%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 82% compared to 53% of the Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P. The first tyre test of Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/45 R18 test, where both the ContiWinterContact TS 850P and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P has C wet grip rating, whereas 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating.
| # | Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P | 31,8 | 25,2 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 34,4 | 24,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Satisfactory | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 2,1 |
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,3 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,9 | ||||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Very good | 8,1 | ||||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Very good | 8,9 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
