Segment
2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Nokian WetProof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the ContiPremiumContact 5 is made in Czech Republic and WetProof is made in Finland.
| # | Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WetProof Recommended
