Segment
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Apollo (43%). The first tyre test of Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Apollo Alnac 4G first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the ContiPremiumContact 5 and the Alnac 4G were tested. We also know where ContiPremiumContact 5 is made - Czech Republic.
| # | Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
| Apollo Alnac 4G
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 34,7 | 30,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 38,6 | 32,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
