Segment
2. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2
Table of contents:
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Firestone Multiseason 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When comparing Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Firestone Multiseason 2, there are significant differences to consider. Manufactured in the Czech Republic and Italy respectively, these formulations from Continental and Firestone have their strengths and weaknesses, with the Continental tyre edging ahead with an 85% rating from us compared to Firestone's 60%.
Both tyres have excelled in certain aspects during tests, however Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has consistently held a higher overall position. In Autobild tests, the AllSeasonContact 2 came in 3rd out of 37 and 2nd out of 16, showcasing excellent exterior noise levels, snow handling and cornering, wet braking and circle cornering. Firestone Multiseason 2, while performing well in rolling resistance, found itself at the lower end of the spectrum with positions 22 and 13.
The AllSeasonContact 2 is praised for its balanced performance level with a strong showing on snow and ice, short braking distances and good grip. It also provides sporty and safe handling on wet surfaces. Nonetheless, the tyre shows average reserves when it comes to aquaplaning and leans towards a higher price level.
The Multiseason 2 offers a stable driving experience on snow and wet surfaces with pleasantly low rolling resistance. Nevertheless, it falls short with average aquaplaning qualities, understeering during snow and dry handling, and limited mileage.
In conclusion, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 seems to be a more balanced all-rounder with convincing winter qualities, dynamic handling and short braking distances on wet surfaces. Though the Firestone Multiseason 2 tyre offers a decent performance level, it sits behind the Continental tyre in terms of overall test performances and our rating.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.0 | 53.6 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41.8 | 64.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.4 | 45.4 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41.8 | 47.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | ||||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
