Segment
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we are looking at two all-season tyres: the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO and the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. Both tyres are designed to offer reliable performance in various weather conditions, but there are some key differences that can help determine which tyre is more suitable for your driving needs.
The Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO, made in HU and IT, achieves an overall rating of 85%. This tyre is particularly strong in wet and dry conditions, with excellent wet braking, wet circle cornering, dry handling, and comfort, as observed in the Autobild test. It has ranked third among 11 tested tyres. Drawbacks include its average performance on snow and ice, delays in steering response, and medium mileage, as noted in the autobild 2022 test.
The Kumho HA32 Solus 4S, made in CN, has an overall rating of 76%. This tyre's strong points include snow braking, mileage, price/value, and stability in handling. It ranked ninth in the Autobild test. The drawbacks are its slightly longer wet/dry braking distances, and mediocre aquaplaning reserves, as mentioned in the autobild 2022 test.
Based on these test results, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO seems to be the better tyre when it comes to wet and dry conditions, as well as comfort. It has the edge in terms of overall performance, as demonstrated by its higher rating and third-place ranking in the Autobild test.
On the other hand, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S stands out for its snow braking and overall value, considering its price and mileage. It may be a good choice for drivers who prioritize winter performance and long-lasting tyres. However, its overall performance is not as strong as the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.
In conclusion, if you're looking for a tyre with superior wet and dry performance, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO may be the better choice. But if you want a more balanced tyre with good snow performance and a focus on longevity, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S could be more suitable. Both tyres are available from their respective manufacturers, Bridgestone and Kumho.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 44,4 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2+ | 2 | 3 | 2- | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 52,9 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2- | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
