Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Premium2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Vredestein (55%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo and Vredestein Sportrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Vredestein Sportrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Turanza T001 Evo and the Sportrac 5 were tested.
# | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
| Vredestein Sportrac 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Premium2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium
2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | |
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Rating: Good | dobré | 2,0 | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 2,7 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,7 | |
Show test details |