Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Hankook (71%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Turanza T001 Evo and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | |
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Rating: Good | dobré | 2,0 | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
