Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo vs. Fulda EcoControl HP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Bridgestone (57%). In this particular case, the Fulda EcoControl HP has a better rating of 51% compared to 22% of the Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Fulda EcoControl HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Turanza T001 Evo and the EcoControl HP were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo has A wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo | Fulda EcoControl HP | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | 3,4 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||