Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Firestone (70%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Turanza T001 Evo and the Roadhawk were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (99%) of the Firestone Roadhawk also have A wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | |
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Rating: Good | dobré | 2,0 | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 1,7 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
