Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Bridgestone Turanza 6 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 have been put through their paces in several tyre tests, revealing their strengths and weaknesses. Let's take a look at what the details say about these two summer tyres from renowned manufacturers Bridgestone and Kumho.
Both are strong contenders, with the Bridgestone Turanza 6 achieving an overall rating of 87% and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 scoring 81%. As a successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, the HS52 improves upon its predecessor with enhancements mostly in handling and braking.
In a comparison by Autobild, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 fell in the 10th position out of 55 tyres tested. In contrast, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 shone brightly, taking the 2nd spot. The HS52 was particularly praised for its outstanding performance in dry and wet braking, along with excellent dry handling.
In another review, Autobild praised the Turanza 6's balanced driving capabilities, secure handling in wet and dry conditions, and short braking distances. The Turanza 6 was credited for its performance and longevity, outperforming many competitors.
ADAC's review added further insight to these tyres' performance. Out of 16 tyres tested, Bridgestone Turanza 6 claimed the 6th position while the Kumho Ecsta HS52 attained the 3rd position. The Bridgestone was recognized for its excellent resistance to aquaplaning, low interior noise, and durability.
The Kumho Ecsta HS52, on the other hand, was applauded for its mileage and excellent cornering on wet surfaces. However, a few weaknesses were pointed out in both tyres. The Bridgestone showed minor weaknesses in dry and wet surface handling whereas the Kumho had slight weaknesses in aquaplaning behavior and higher tyre weight.
To summarise, if you are after longevity, balanced driving, and secure handling, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 is a solid choice, despite minor issues with handling on different surfaces. For those prioritizing excellent dry and wet surface performance, high mileage, and budget-friendliness, choosing the Kumho Ecsta HS52 might be the better option.
Keep in mind that the right tyre for you depends on your specific driving conditions and requirements. Both tyres offer excellent value in their respective segments, indicative of the quality expected from manufacturers Bridgestone and Kumho.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 36,9 | 27,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,6 | 1,7 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,2 | 2,8 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,8 | 2,1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
