Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone R-Drive 002 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Bridgestone (68%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Bridgestone R-Drive 002 has B wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A rating.
| # | Bridgestone R-Drive 002
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
