Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than GoodYear (78%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has a better rating of 91% compared to 46% of the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 255/35 R19 test, where both the Potenza Sport and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (74%) of the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Potenza Sport is made in Poland/Hungary and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is made in Slovenia/Germany.
# | Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,1 | 5,7 | 5,7 | 6,3 | |||
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Very good | 9 | 8,9 | 9,6 | 6,3 | |||
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good | 8,5 | 9 | 8,4 | 7,7 | |||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: - | |||||||
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Show test details |