Segment
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Ecopia EP500 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Kumho (60%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Ecopia EP500 and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Ecopia EP500 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C rating.
| # | Bridgestone Ecopia EP500
| Kumho PorTran CW51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
