Segment
2. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Duravis All Season vs. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Bridgestone (68%). In this particular case, the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate has a better rating of 81% compared to 41% of the Bridgestone Duravis All Season. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/75 R16 test, where both the Duravis All Season and the Agilis CrossClimate were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Duravis All Season
| Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Test winner2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Recommended2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Bridgestone Duravis All Season Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | ||||||
| Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Rating: Test winner | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||