Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak W810 and Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the BluEarth winter WY01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
