Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Uniroyal winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has a better rating of 45% compared to 40% of the Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the SNOW MAX 2 were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak W810 | Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,1 | 4,2 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||