Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has a better rating of 55% compared to 45% of the Bridgestone Blizzak W810. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 78% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B rating.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak W810 | Michelin AGILIS ALPIN | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 71 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |