Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Bridgestone (75%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak W810 and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B rating.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |