Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Matador (38%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak W810 and Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van also have C wet ratings.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
Show test details |