• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has a better rating of 45% compared to 40% of the Kumho PorTran CW51. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the PorTran CW51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 78% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Kumho PorTran CW51 also have C wet ratings.

# Bridgestone Blizzak W810
/45%
Kumho PorTran CW51
/40%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R17 R14 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,42,32,22,32,52,01,6
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Rating: Conditionally recommended
4,04,12,62,83,73,02,0
Kumho PorTran CW51
Rating: Conditionally recommended
3,64,13,02,63,03,02,0
Show test details