Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Continental VanContact Winter Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Continental VanContact Winter has a better rating of 75% compared to 45% of the Bridgestone Blizzak W810. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Continental VanContact Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the VanContact Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 78% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Continental VanContact Winter has B rating.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak W810 | Continental VanContact Winter | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Continental VanContact Winter Premium
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |