Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Toyo Snowprox S954 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo vs. Toyo Snowprox S954
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Toyo (49%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Toyo Snowprox S954 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-80 Evo and the Snowprox S954 were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Toyo Snowprox S954
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Toyo Snowprox S954 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Toyo Snowprox S954 Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | vítěz testu | 147 | 134 | 143 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: - | 355 | (-) | 97 | 123 | 135 | ||
| Toyo Snowprox S954 Rating: - | 348 | (-) | 121 | 123 | 104 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||