Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-80 Evo and the WR SUV 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Nokian WR SUV 3 also have C wet ratings.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: - | 355 | 97 | 123 | 135 | |||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | 131 | 128 | 131 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: - | 3 | 3+ | 2+ | ||||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
Show test details |