Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-80 Evo and the WR D4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
1. Nokian WR D4 70%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian WR D4 73%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
2. Nokian WR D4 89%
Snow braking
2. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow cornering
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Comfort
2. Nokian WR D4 71%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 9,8 | 9,3 | 9,5 | 9,1 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 5,7 | 7,9 | 9,5 | 7,9 | ||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 9,0 | 9,3 | 8,7 | 8,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||