• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Bridgestone (75%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo and Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-80 Evo and the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 also have C wet ratings.

# Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
/0%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
/0%

Add to comparison

Bridgestone
Hankook
DimensionsR15 - R20 R16 - R18
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AutoMotorSport
Name RatingWetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in testvelmi doporučeno9,89,39,59,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
Rating: Still recommended
částečně doporučeno5,77,99,5 7,9
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
Rating: Still recommended
částečně doporučeno7,48,08,57,3
Show test details