Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Bridgestone (75%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo and Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-80 Evo and the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 also have C wet ratings.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 9,8 | 9,3 | 9,5 | 9,1 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 5,7 | 7,9 | 9,5 | 7,9 | ||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 7,4 | 8,0 | 8,5 | 7,3 | ||
Show test details |