Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Bridgestone (75%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-80 Evo and the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo has C wet grip rating, whereas 78% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 has B rating.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 9,8 | 9,3 | 9,5 | 9,1 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 5,7 | 7,9 | 9,5 | 7,9 | ||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 9,7 | 8,0 | 9,0 | 8,0 | ||
Show test details |