Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Premium2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Pirelli (53%). Important for this comparison is also the Autoexpress 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-32 and the Winter Sottozero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Conditionally recommended2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | 95,8 | 99,1 | 95 | 84 | 99,3 | ||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 99,6 | 99 | 94,8 | 93 | 99,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | velmi doporučeno | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,4 | podmíněně doporučeno | 6,6 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 7,3 | |
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: - | 9,1 | Velmi doporučeno | 8,7 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
