14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 84% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 47x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.21

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

92%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

84%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

73%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

70%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 63%

Price/value

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Ice braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Rating	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	dobré	2	2.1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	dobré	3.1	2.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2.4	2.7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	vítěz testu	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	1-	2	2-	3+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	dobré	1-	2+	2	3+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2-	2	1-	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	dobré	1,7	1,9	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,5	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	1,7	2,1	2,4	2,8	1,9	2,9	3,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2,7	2,6	2,0	2,5	2,4	2,7	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	vítěz testu	2+	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	dobré	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2-	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	dobré	1-	2	1	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	dobré	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	1,7	2,5	2,8	2,3	3,3	3,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2,6	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,3	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	velmi dobré	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,7	velmi dobré	9,6	8,6	8,2	8	7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	7,8	dobré	6,6	7,4	10	5	9
Show test details

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	15,4	16,4	21,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	15,1	15,9	23,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	příkladné	1-	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2-	2-	1-
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	velmi doporučeno	67	48	60	18	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	velmi doporučeno	64	47	60	17	7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	doporučeno	63	42	60	14	9
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	velmi dobré	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	velmi dobré	9,5	8,5	9,2	10	8
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	velmi dobré	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	1-	2+	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2+	2+	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2	2	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	1-	2	2	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands