Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 DriveGuard vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 DriveGuard and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 DriveGuard has A wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 DriveGuard
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
