Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory