Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Fulda (42%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R15 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary
2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 1- | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 35,5 | 28,1 | |||||
Show test details |