14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Bridgestone (75%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 185/65 R15 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 860 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and WinterContact TS 860 is made in Portugal/Slovakia.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /64%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 73

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

84%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

74%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

72%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

70%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ACE Winter tyre test 2018 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Rating	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	206	vítěz testu	67	68	43	19	8	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	182	doporučeno	58	53	43	15	6	7
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Test winner	206	vítěz testu	66	68	43	16	7	6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	dobré	1-	2-	2	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2017 225/45 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	96,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	100
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	100	96,9	99,8	99	100	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	98,4	95,6	96	94,9	85,6	99,8
Continental WinterContact TS 860	100	94,6	99,8	96,2	100	100
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	velmi dobré	100	103,3	100,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	dobré	98,3	98,9	98,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Very good	101	velmi dobré	99,5	103,3	100,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	Příkladné	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	Dostatečné	2	3+	2+	1-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	Příkladné	1-	2	2+	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	velmi doporučeno	142	127	143	25	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	doporučeno	100	114	127	19	8
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	412	velmi doporučeno	142	127	143	25	9
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands