Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 1 | 2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
Show test details |