Segment
2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Vredestein (71%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO and Vredestein Snowtrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Vredestein Snowtrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 EVO and the Snowtrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,1 | velmi doporučeno | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Still recommended | 7,8 | ještě doporučeno | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Still recommended | 7,8 | ještě doporučeno | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2- | 3+ | 2 | ||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,0 | 1,9 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,3 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | 34,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
