14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Bridgestone (75%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 EVO and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO has B wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C rating.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /72%

Dimensions	R15 - R17	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 10

Number of tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 4x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 6.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 14.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 9.75

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 2018

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

81%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 73%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

85%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 81%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 86%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

Wet handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 81%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO B

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

91%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

65%

Snow braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 71%

Snow cornering

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 50%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 63%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

81%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 82%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 59%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

90%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

84%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 98%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 85%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO ?

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Rating
Best values in test	9,1	velmi doporučeno
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Still recommended	7,8	ještě doporučeno
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended*	8,0	doporučeno
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	1-	2+	1	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2+	2-	3+	2
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	dobré	2	2	1-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO	34,3	29,8
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	34,9	27,7
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands