14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Bridgestone (75%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ also have B wet ratings.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO /0%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ /82%

Dimensions	R15 - R17	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Premium

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 177

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 10

Number of tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 22x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 4x

Best position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 6.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 14.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.32

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 9.75

Year of the last test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 2018

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

87%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

77%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 74%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 76%

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

82%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 76%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 80%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 82%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 79%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO B

Snow

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

65%

Snow braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 71%

Snow cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 50%

Snow handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 63%

Snow traction

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 78%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 82%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO C

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

77%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

Interior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 60%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

85%

Ice braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands