• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Goodyear UltraGrip 9 has a better rating of 76% compared to 52% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Goodyear UltraGrip 9 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 EVO and the UltraGrip 9 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO has B wet grip rating, whereas 63% of Goodyear UltraGrip 9 has C rating.

# Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
/52%
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
/76%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR15 - R17 R14 - R16
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Points total
Best values in test9,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Rating: Still recommended
7,8
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
Rating: Recommended
8,2
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+11
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Rating: Satisfactory
2+2-3+2
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
Rating: Good
2 2-1 2
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,12,01,82,33,01,01,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Rating: Satisfactory
2,42,12,92,3 3,61,0 1,9
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
Rating: Good
2,1 2,32,02,53,32,01,8
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,327
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO34,3 29,8
Goodyear UltraGrip 935,527
Show test details