Segment
1. BFGoodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM2 Upper-middle2. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM2 vs. Nokian WeatherProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than BFGoodrich (50%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM2 and Nokian WeatherProof, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM2 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WeatherProof first tested.
| # | BFGoodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM2
| Nokian WeatherProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
