18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 81% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterCraft WP52+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ also have B wet ratings. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
23
3
Best position
#1
#4
Average position
6.7
4.3
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
107
99

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
55%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Dry Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
64%
Snow Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
83%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
96%
Snow Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
74%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Economy
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2025225/40 R18View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.