14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than BFGoodrich (75%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 64% of the Continental WinterContact TS 860. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 860 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WinterContact TS 860 is made in Portugal/Slovakia.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /64%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 73

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 96%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 97%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 83%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 97%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

76%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	dobré	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2,6	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,3	2,0
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	1,6	2,7	1,9	2,5	2,9	2,5
Show test details

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	15,1	15,9	23,3
Continental WinterContact TS 860	15,4	16,4	21,7
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	velmi doporučeno	67	48	60	18	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	doporučeno	63	42	60	14	9
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Recommended	192	doporučeno	63	48	52	18	7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2+	2-	1-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2+	2+	1-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	1	2
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands