Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Sava (67%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 57% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C rating.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
