• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Nokian WR D4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the WR D4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Nokian WR D4 also have B wet ratings.

# BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
/0%
Nokian WR D4
/0%

Add to comparison

BFGoodrich
Nokian
DimensionsR16 - R20 R13 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name RatingWetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in testdobré2,12,01,92,33,10,51,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2,62,61,9 2,53,21,51,5
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2,62,51,9 2,53,42,52,0
Show test details