Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than BFGoodrich (75%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and Michelin Alpin 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Alpin 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the Alpin 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Alpin 5 also have B wet ratings.
# | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
| Michelin Alpin 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle
2. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 0,5 | 2,3 |
Show test details |