Segment
2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C rating.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 2,0 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 2,1 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
